St Phils Blog - Thursday 15th November
Thursday, November 15, 2012 at 9:34AM The National Royal Commission into Abuse...
For what it is worth, I am in favour of the Royal Commission into Abuse, announced by Prime Minister Gillard this week. I am in favour of their powers to reach into church affairs as well. Last week in this blog I spoke of the church-state divide from the perspective of the church, that as the Church of Jesus we have one Lord – the same Lord who appoints the government authorities and asks us to submit to them under Him. The Royal Commission is an example of where I believe all churches need to respect that authority and submit to our government, opening our doors, books, records – whatever – for examination. Why? 2 obvious reasons for starters:
(a) We are in the light.
In the letter of 1 John, the apostle speaks about believers being brought into fellowship with the Father and the Son (1:1-4), because of the atoning sacrifice of Jesus Christ (2:1-2). He illustrates this fellowship with the Father with the concept that we have moved from darkness into light (1:5-2:2). He even goes so far as to say that those who are in Christ walk like Jesus did (2:6). As Jesus was pure and blameless, those that are with Him ought to be as well. Being in the light means that we are exposed – rightly so – for our deeds are not hidden from God, and nor should they be from anyone else.
(b) Abuse is sin. We want no part of it.
There is no “thou shall not abuse” proof-text verse in the bible – but the fruit of sin has all the requisite framework for any kind of abuse: “The acts of the sinful nature are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like.” (Gal 5:19). In short, sin is condemned by Jesus and abuse clearly falls into sin. As a gathering of God’s people, the Church of Jesus needs to oppose sin in all its forms, expose it, confess it, correcting the situation that produced it, and depending on the sin, paying the social consequences of the sin.
... And the Catholic Church
This is where the Roman Catholic Church has been called into the spotlight. The Catholic church has as part of its doctrine that things that are confessed to a priest in a confessional setting are unexaminable to outside parties. Our current Federal Law in Australia respects this doctrine and things confessed to a priest are unable to be used as evidence, and priests are allowed to refuse to give evidence in a court of law about things revealed in that setting. As Cardinal George Pell said in the press conference on Tuesday, ''The seal of confession is inviolable''.
(a) A Quick Background
This doctrine comes out of a passage in Matthew 16:16-20, where Jesus responds to Peter declaring that He is the Christ, the Son of the living God. He says “And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven”. The Roman Catholic church understands this verse to mean that Jesus has appointed Peter in particular to a role now seen as the role of the Pope. And the binding/loosing authority given him and the church was the power of Jesus to work in this world. To summarise:
Rock = Peter
Church = Roman Catholic Church
Keys = Authority of God on earth.
In short, the Roman Catholic church understands that Jesus works in this world through the church, and so when the church declares a person forgiven, therefore they are. The “confessional box” then becomes a powerful vehicle for people seeking to receive the forgiveness of God – and the priest that they confess to has the authority of God to remove a person’s sin.
(b) A Correction
But I believe that this is a false reading of the passage. I have spoken on this passage and you can listen to my sermon on it here. A far more satisfying understanding is that the ‘rock’ is the gospel – the good news of Jesus, and it is the message of Jesus crucified and risen that will build His church (and bring people into the light). The keys given to Peter were given to all the Apostles to teach, so that people would come to trust in Jesus as Lord. That message has been written down in the Bible so that in 2012, we benefit from the same teaching. The binding/loosing is the work of the gospel in binding people to Christ and destroying sin in their lives. In summary:
Rock = Gospel
Church = Believers all over the world, who trust in Jesus
Keys = Apostolic authority to preach, bringing people to Jesus
All this makes sense of passages like 1Timothy 5:5, which says: “For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus”. When we confess sin, it goes straight to Jesus, not via a priest or minister (that includes me) or even a ‘saint’.
(c) What this means for the Royal Commission into abuse
Right thinking on this passage, I believe, means that there is no biblical framework for an inviolable seal of confession. It means that there should not be any special protection in the law for things confessed in that situation. I believe that there should not be anything which could not be exposed when delving into the way the Roman Catholic Church (as with any ‘organisation’) deals with abuse. Put more specifically: Where priests learn about abuse of any form, they ought to be obliged to report it. This is for the safety and protection of the victims, the exposure of perpetrators and ultimately because God is the Judge who hates sin.
From a Christian perspective: let the light shine in. Into the Anglican church, like anyone else. And let there be purity that honours Jesus in all our dealings.
Comments and replies to andrew@stphils.org.
YBIC,
Andrew
Footnote: Just so you know, Stefan, Alex, Jarrod and myself are all mandatory reporters which means that our jobs demand we report any claims of abuse. Our children’s and youth leaders are trained and expected to report anything to their leaders, unless the allegation involves the leader. The Diocese has set up help to make sure that every claim is handled appropriately and there is accountability.
